Welcome to the Q&A Forum

@Tracey_Evans agreed. You should also consider that browsers will cache data for websites they visit @moz46y

If a user visits a URL that returns a 301 status code it will remember this. If the user tries to access that redirect URL in the future the browser can just take them to the version that returns a 200 status code (in the name of efficiency).

This can be undone, but it requires the user clearing their browser's cache.

Not sure if it would be an issue in your use case but it's worthwhile knowing!

Cheers,
Stefan

@moz46y
Reusing a URL that has already been redirected with a 301 redirect is indeed feasible, but it requires careful consideration. When you remove the 301 redirect and re-establish the original URL with new content, search engines like Google need time to re-crawl and re-index this URL. The success of this approach largely depends on the quality and relevance of the new content. If the content is high-quality, relevant to the keyword, and offers a good user experience, there's a good chance that the URL can regain its ranking potential. It's important to focus on on-page SEO, internal linking, and backlinking to aid in quicker re-indexing and potentially restore the URL’s authority.

However, there are risks involved. The URL may not regain its previous ranking quickly, especially for competitive keywords. The history of redirects might cause search engines to take more time to trust the URL again. Therefore, it's crucial to monitor its performance closely using tools like Google Search Console to track changes in ranking and traffic. If the URL is crucial for very important keywords and you're concerned about potential risks, you might consider creating a new, similarly optimized URL as a safer alternative. In summary, while reusing a previously 301 redirected URL is possible and can be successful, it's a strategy that requires a strategic approach, careful implementation, and continuous monitoring.